An Exploded View publication

Reading Room

Vol. 1 · No. 63 Friday, October 30, 2026 aikansh.com

This week's theme

Looking past the model to what actually runs it

Today's pieces look under the shiny layer: a chip built inside a model, startups chasing power and permits, an agent priced to win, and what a broker really does.

A 9-minute read · 5 stories

In this issue

01 Front Page

A small AI model has a working computer chip inside it

A researcher built a real RISC-V processor out of a language model's own memory.

This shows how blurry the line between a model and a computer is getting, which matters for anyone trying to reason about what these systems can really do by themselves, with no outside tools. A researcher built a project called Qwenputer by taking a stock (unmodified) Qwen 3.5 model with 4 billion parameters (the model's internal settings) and adding one thing: a RISC-V chip, a common and simple processor design, built directly into the model's own weights. That chip runs entirely inside the model's own process of writing out an answer, and it can do arithmetic and run real C and MicroPython code with no outside tool, sandbox, or separate computer behind it at all.

The trick rests on a kind of layer called Gated DeltaNet (GDN), a lighter alternative to standard attention that three out of every four layers in Qwen 3.5 use to track context. Each GDN layer keeps a running state, like a notebook, that normally fades a little with every new word based on a 'gate' setting. The researcher found that by setting that gate to never forget, setting the write strength to fully overwrite instead of blend, and addressing memory with a method that points at exactly one slot, a GDN layer turns into exact, addressable RAM (working memory): write to one slot, read it back perfectly, and it costs far less than using the model's normal attention as memory. The underlying math was shown to work this way in an earlier paper; what is new is making it exact and addressable inside a real, working model, reliably enough to run a whole chip on top of it.

No training was involved in building the chip itself. A compiler takes a plain description of the chip, steps like 'read this slot', 'add these two numbers', or 'jump if zero', and turns each one directly into a slice of a transformer layer: attention heads that look values up, feed forward units that do the math, and GDN heads that hold the memory. The chip runs as the model generates text, producing a small burst of tokens (chunks of text, roughly three quarters of a word each) for every instruction it executes.

The chip itself is a 32 bit RISC-V core (the RV32IM instruction set, plus one extra math extension and a unit for big number arithmetic), and it takes up 11 of the model's 32 total layers. It cannot run Linux yet, but it covers the full instruction set and runs real C and MicroPython programs, just slowly. On a big number division test, Qwenputer scored 97.5 percent, beating the 95 percent a base Qwen model gets when handed a separate Python tool to do the math, and far ahead of the 72.5 percent base Qwen scores with no tool at all.

via Divyansh Agrawal →
02 Insights

YC's new wish list bets on pipes and permits, not smarter models

Y Combinator's latest call for startups says the next AI opening sits in power, chips, and permits, not better models.

Y Combinator, the startup accelerator that funded Airbnb and Stripe early, just published its Winter 2027 wish list for founders, and it marks a real shift away from AI apps toward the physical stuff AI now runs into. That matters for how you think about where real opportunity in this space is heading, since it is a read on where serious early money expects the next wave to land. The list opens with one line: "AI's biggest bottlenecks are moving beyond the models."

The list names 11 areas to build in. Among the ones spelled out: getting access to space, rebuilding the US supply chain for robot parts, data center equipment, financing for physical AI projects, verifying who qualifies for government benefits, speeding up city permitting, AI systems built to run with no internet connection at all (called "air-gapped" AI, used where security matters most), AI models built and owned for one single industry rather than general use, AI-backed expert services, and models that simply write well.

The argument underneath all 11: intelligence itself is getting cheap, but steel, magnets, transformers, permits, verified data, capital, and trust are not. That is a turn from YC's own prior list for Fall 2026, which was mostly consumer AI apps: a multiplayer AI product, a cloud platform for small software, AI tools aimed at a billion consumers, AI for older adults, crypto, and tools to prove a user is human. In the new list, consumer apps are gone except for one request about writing quality. The venture firm a16z made a similar call in its own State of Markets 2026 report, describing the same move "from bits to atoms" and arguing that supply chain bottlenecks are now where pricing power sits. The numbers back it up: AI took $102 billion of the $159 billion in worldwide venture funding in the third quarter of 2026, and the giant cloud computing companies, sometimes called hyperscalers, are on track to spend about $1 trillion this year on buildings, chips, and equipment.

At least one deadline is already on the calendar: new Medicaid work-requirement rules take effect in 40 states and Washington DC on January 1, 2027, creating a verification market the list points to directly. The newsletter's own read is that the giant funding rounds are going to a small number of companies.

One honest limit: the newsletter's full breakdown, the actual 33 startup ideas with named target customers and business models, the 5 underlying themes, and specific details like a July regulatory action tying up robot parts, sit behind its paywall. What's captured here is the framing and the hard numbers, not the idea list itself.

Intelligence is getting cheap.
via Linas's Newsletter →

A Harvard AI safety researcher took open questions, no strings attached

Outside your usual reading: a Harvard researcher who studies AI safety opened himself up to blunt questions about AI risk, on the record, with no corporate ties behind him.

The researcher says he will cover AI safeguards (limits on what an AI system is allowed to do), AI incidents, and AI governance (the rules and oversight that decide how AI gets built and used). Before Harvard he finished his PhD at MIT and did a research stint at the UK AI Security Institute. Opening the session, he wrote in his own words: "I never have and never will work for big tech, and have never signed a non-disparagement agreement," a type of contract that would otherwise bar him from criticizing a past employer.

He said the topics open for questions were AI safety, safeguards, risk, governance, state and federal legislation, and AI terrorism incidents, and he took questions for one hour, from 3 to 4pm Eastern time.

Worth being honest about: what's captured here is only his own opening post, the credential and the ground rules for the session, not a transcript of what he actually answered. Still, a researcher with that background, zero Big Tech ties, and a public promise never to sign away his right to criticize, is a useful counterweight to read next to the hype.

I never have and never will work for big tech, and have never signed a non-disparagement agreement.
via r/ArtificialInteligence →
03 Tools & Craft

Herdr app tracks every AI coding agent across your terminals

A free desktop app that keeps every running Claude or Codex session in one sidebar.

This is worth trying if you are ever running more than one Claude or Codex session at once, which you often are. Herdr is a free desktop app built to sit on top of your terminal windows and your AI coding agents (AI tools that work through several steps on their own without you watching every move).

The core idea is a 'space': a space usually holds the work for one repo on one machine. Inside a space you get tabs, and you can split any tab into panes to put several terminals, or Herdr's own panels, side by side. A new tab opens wherever the terminal you were looking at was working, so you are not stuck re-typing paths.

The feature that matters most is the agents sidebar. It pulls every agent running across all your spaces into one list, including worker agents that another agent started on its own, and marks each one Working, Blocked (stuck, waiting on you), Done, or Idle. Click any agent to jump straight to it. If an agent has no window open yet, clicking it pops up a floating peek over whatever you are doing, and you can turn that into a permanent tab if you want to keep watching it.

Closing the Herdr window does not kill your terminals, only closing a specific pane or tab does that, so you can shut your laptop lid and come back to the same running work. You can also add a remote machine over SSH (a standard way to log into another computer securely) from Settings, and any space on that machine runs there, not on your laptop. That remote work keeps going even after you close the window or your laptop goes to sleep, as long as the remote machine stays on.

Everything about how the window looks is changeable. The command palette (Ctrl+Shift+P, or Cmd+Shift+P on a Mac) lists every action in the app and its keyboard shortcut. Herdr ships three built-in layouts, named Herdr, Terminals, and Herdr 98, and lets you write small programs called 'mods' to draw your own panels, menus, and dialogs. If you want to tweak a built-in layout or mod, duplicate it first, since Herdr overwrites the shipped ones every time it updates.

Installing it is one line: a curl command on Mac and Linux, a PowerShell command on Windows. Updates download quietly in the background and take over the next time you quit and reopen the app; a build you compiled yourself from source has to be updated by hand. Usage tracking is on by default, and you can turn it off in Settings under Privacy. The whole thing is open source, written in Rust, and the code lives at github.com/herdrdev/herdr-app.

via GitHub →

20 open source AI projects ranked by GitHub stars

This saved LinkedIn post lists 20 popular open source AI projects, sorted by how many people have starred them on GitHub (a way of bookmarking and rating a project there). Coding agents dominate the top of the list: OpenClaw has 278,000 stars, Hermes Agent 200,000, Open WebUI 126,000, and Claude Code 75,000. A quick way to see what the open source AI crowd is actually using, and worth a scan if you want to try something new.

via his own note →
The Last Word
The model is now a computer, and the bottleneck is a permit office.
The Desk Report

How this edition came together — from bookmarks and feeds to the page.

224links gathered
40read by the desk
6made the edition

Where they came from

On the cutting-room floor — 34 links read but not run this week

Quality over volume: most links get a second look and a pass. The ones that made it earned their place.

Reading Room — every Sunday

The week's AI signal in 9 minutes — what happened, why it matters, and what to do with it. Curated by someone who actually builds, not a feed algorithm.